Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts

29.9.19

A Film a Week - Verdict

previously published on Asian Movie Pulse

The topic of domestic violence is usually a tricky one. Luckily, the Filipino director Raymund Ribay Gutierrez picks the right approach: the straight one for his feature debut “Verdict”. The film has just premiered at Venice, in Orizzonti competition and its universal appeal of domestic drama combined with procedural about the faulty state of the country’s bureaucracy should assure its vibrant and long festival life.

The film opens at home with Joy Santos (Max Eigenmann, quite active on the domestic film and TV scene in the recent years) and her daughter Angel (Jordhen Suan). Their evening routine is suddenly interrupted when Joy’s husband and Angel’s father Dante (Kristoffer King, also pretty prolific lately) comes back home violently drunk and angry about some miscommunication between him and Joy. As the argument gets more and more heated, he gets physically violent toward his spouse, even hitting their child who gets in between. After slashing him with a kitchen knife in an obvious act of self-defense, Joy, pretty beaten up, runs with Angel to the nearest police station.

There is no doubt that it is not the first time Joy takes a beating from her husband and it is also granted that it would not be the last, unless she does something about it. So she files the charges against her violent husband and puts him in jail, at least temporarily, while the two of them move to a safe house kind of establishment. The trial at the court of law ensues and, as it is usually the case, it is less about justice or even law per se. So the lawyer’s games of rhetorics and establishing the narrative in which the evidence and the testimonies by witnesses would or would not stand, while everything is more or less left to the judge’s frivolous interpretation.

No doubt that domestic violence is still a big thing even in the most developed parts of the world and that countries with stronger patriarchal culture face even more problems in that regard. It is usually not the matter of positive legislative that condemns any form of discrimination and abuse of (physical and let us say economic and political) power, but the one of patterns deeply rooted in culture. Most of the cases are not being reported for various reasons and even those that are processed by the police and the court are being treated as some kind of minor offenses.

Gutierrez knows it and is not shy to show it openly using the stylistic choices along the lines of cinema verite and its echoes all over the world, usually relying on long, hand-held takes done by the cinematographer Joshua Reyles and somewhat rough editing by Diego Marx Dobles. The emotional effect is maximized even before the film’s greatest trick – the smooth transition from the domestic violence drama to procedural and court thriller of sorts that also corresponds with the transition from an individual to a more universal level. The ending with a twist is also a treat that deserves to remain spoiler-free.

It is evident that Gutierrez has a good understanding with its cast and crew and that should not be an issue since he has already worked with all of them on a similarly themed short film titled “Judgement” that treats only the courtroom part of the story. In the process of converting a short to a feature film, the actors had the most work, since their characters were developed over the course of it. Both Eigenmann and King are quite compelling in their performances, without slip-ups to the territory of over-expressive melodramatic acting, although her control is visibly better than his. Luckily, they both have to interact with a number of supporting characters played by competently relatively unknown actors who serve as the perfect buffer between the two of them.

All things considered, “Verdict” is more than a film with a good cause. Its importance is multi-layered and being simply a very good film also contributes to it.





11.11.15

Court

2014.
scenario i režija: Chaitanya Tamhane
uloge: Vira Sathidar, Vivek Gomber, Geetanjali Kulkarni, Pradeep Joshi

Nemojte me krivo shvatiti, gledanje filmova iz svih krajeva sveta je moja obaveza i interes, ali postoji jedna kinematografija od koje zazirem. Indijska. Nije to stvar rasizma, kulturnog ili drugačijeg, nego stvar iskustva i fobije. Jednostavno, u svakom trenutku očekujem da će iznenada odjeknuti neka apsolutno grozna pesma, i da će to tako ići narednih nekoliko minuta, uz masovni ples i estetiku jeftinog video-spota. Mislim, pogledao sam i alternativne i umetničke indijske filmove i koprodukcije ušminkane tako da budu prijemčivije zapadnom posmatraču, ali strah od pevanja je, izgleda, jači od mene.
Ono što me je privuklo filmu Court bile su redom pozitivne kritike koje sam pročitao, a koje bih olako zanemario da mi se tema nije učinila zanimljivom. Naime, Court se “prodaje” kao “deadpan” komedija, apsurdna i pomalo crna, koja na nišan uzima indijski pravni sistem, ostatak iz kolonijalnog doba, apsurdno naravnan na viktorijanski javni moral i u potpunom neskladu sa modernim načinom života. Iskreno, uživam u sudskim dramama i scenama iz sudnice (osim kad dolaze iz pera Siniše Pavića), a poneki “twist” je uvek dobrodošao. Još uvek sam pod jakim utiskom izraelskog filma Gett: The Trial of Viviane Amsalem, a od Court sam očekivao možda još širu i nekako direktniju satiru.
Dobro, i to sam dobio. Uz pevanje i plesanje, ali neke stvari su neizbežne. Barem je slučaj zanimljiv. Narodni pevač i socijalni/politički ativista je uhapšen jer je, navodno, svojom pesmom naterao radnika kanalizacije na samoubistvo. Skočio čovek u govna kao što je pretio onaj Sava iz “Zbogom, Kikindo...” A možda je i pao slučajno, rizik posla. Naravno, optužnica je suluda, jer kako je moguće naterati nekoga na samoubistvo ako taj nije već sam podložan, a instigator (u odsustvu bolje reči) nije osoba od ekstremnog poverenja. Pevač/aktivista Narayan Kamble (Sathidar) se, uostalom, takvim stvarima i ne bavi, nego poziva na odbacivanje nacionalizma, rasizma, klasizma i naročito kastizma. Zbog čega je u stalnom sukobu sa zakonom.
Tu tek počinje njegova nevolja, ali nije on jedini u nevolji. Po sličnom, ali opet drugačijem osnovu, u nevolji je i njegov mladi advokat Vinay Vora (Gomber), možda još uvek dovoljno mlad da veruje u koncept pravde i zdravu logiku nasuprot okoštalim, apsurdnim zakonima. Ima jedna izuzetno efektna metaforična scena u kojoj on u školi govori o svom poslu i o slučaju, a radnici prolaze da bi uključili ventilator. To je nekako njegov život. Na drugoj strani imao tužiteljku (Kulkarni) koja je više u fazonu “pošteno mu sudite, pa ga bacite u zatvor na 20 godina, ako je moguće što pre, evo sad će pauza za ručak” i sudiju kojem je pravda možda sekundarna stvar, ako se uzme u obzir da proces pre svega mora početi, trajati i okončati se. Prema propisima, naravno.
Ono što film čini zanimljivim je fotografija, u dugim kadrovima, koja oslikava situaciju u sudnici, na ulici i u privatnim životima učesnika procesa. Posebno su efektni kadrovi sudnice iz lagano povišene perspektive, tako da podsećaju na CCTV snimke i dobijaju na dokumentarističkoj težini. Ti kadrovi su jedan od glavnih razloga zašto ovakav apsurd percipiramo kao realno moguću opciju, a ne kao humor radi humora i smeh radi smeha. Tom utisku doprinosi i dobra, odmerena gluma, što je poseban uspeh za Viru Sathidara, koji je zapravo pevač, a ne glumac. Možda nema previše teksta, ali njegovo prisustvo na ekranu je realistično i unosi nešto težine.

Pohvalu je zaslužio i autor Chaitanya Tamhane. Court mu je prvi film i on već pokazuje finesu kakva se traži od pravog, punokrvnog autora. Istina, film je mogao biti i kraći, jer sasvim uspešno prenosi poentu i ranije, mada i ovako razdužen (na oko 2 sata) metaforički ukazuje na sudske procese bez kraja na vidiku. E, da, moglo je i bez tog pevanja. Odnosno, sa manje pevanja. Ipak je film o pevaču, pa mora malo.