Well,
I am pretty sure that an ex-YouTube videographer and short filmmaker
Joe Penna had his very good reasons for Arctic to be
his first feature, but I am struggling to find any reason for
audience to see it. Maybe, just maybe it can be found in a challenge
put before Mads Mikkelsen as an actor: Can he hold the grip
over out attention for 90 plus minutes just by being in frame, doing
the typical (but still pretty realistic) survival stuff and barely
speaking, either to himself or his companion he would find further
down the road? The answer would be: "Yes, he can.",
followed by a counter-question: "But why?"
Arctic
is a disaster movie, but narrowly escaping the label "a disaster
of a movie". It falls along the lines of the "new school"
of the genre, the one that promotes minimalism and realism as opposed
to noise, spectacle and the inflation of action like we witnessed
during the 90's. Comparisons might be drawn to titles like Danny
Boyle's 127 Hours and J.C. Chandor's All Is
Lost, which is hardly a good thing having in mind that both films
are considerably better than Penna's execution-wise and that they
actually brought something new to the genre when they appeared.
Arctic does too little too late to reform the genre, but for
our own consolation, at least we do not have to stand more
hurricanes, tsunamis, volcano eruptions or asteroid hits.
Penna
and his co-writer Ryan Morrison actually have a few
interesting ideas. Locating the story in the Arctic wasteland where
the lack of events (like appearance of rescue planes, hunting and
clear water opportunities) is more sure to kill the protagonist if he
has survived the initial disaster was a smart move. The same goes for
the decision not to show the event, the plane crash landing, itself,
although we will later see a helicopter crashing down. In that
manner, the story is refreshingly devoid of the context and we meet
our guy named Overgard when he has already accepted his faith (in a
way) and adapted to a number of new routines like fishing for food,
looking for signal on his distress radio and mapping the area.
The
crash of a passing helicopter rises the stakes by coming with its
pros and cons: Overgard can use some of the equipment, but he also
has to take care of another victim, a young woman that slips in and
out of consciousness played by Icelandic actress Maria Thelma
Smáradóttir. That second crash and the better map he has found
propels him to trade his safe, Robinson Crusoe (with an icy
twist)-like existence for the uncertainty of finding a more visible
place to summon help. The other person proves to be more of a ballast
than a partner, though some sense of loyalty is forged on the way,
but more than that a simple dramaturgical device to enable our guy to
talk to somebody, even though that person hardly (if at all) gives
any response.
The
trouble with Arctic and that kind of movies in general is that
all the good narrative ideas are being used early on, leaving us to
the expected dramaturgical clichés and formulae in the second half.
The other problem ensues with the lack of dialogue, which opens a lot
of empty space in the sound scheme. Penna and the producers made a
mistake opting for generic and often too loud soundtrack instead of
insisting on the scariness of the natural sound like howling wind and
ice and snow moving. Mikkelsen himself is good enough in his role to
elevate the film from the level of strange curiosity to average
(Icelandic landscape also helps a bit), but not more than that. He is
just too limited by sketchy writing of both his character and the
situations that happen to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment